PM immunity: High Court to rule on legal questions referral tomorrow


KUALA LUMPUR: The High Court here has set Wednesday (June 4) for its decision on an application by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to refer eight legal questions to the Federal Court, including whether a Prime Minister enjoys immunity from lawsuits.

The legal questions relate to a lawsuit filed by Anwar's former research assistant, Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerning an alleged sexual assault seven years ago.

Judge Roz Mawar Rozain fixed the date on Tuesday (June 3) after hearing submissions from lawyer Alan Wong Teck Wei, representing Anwar, and lawyer Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, acting for Yusoff, during in-chamber proceedings.

Anwar filed the application on May 23, seeking to have the High Court, which is hearing the suit, refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court.

The eight legal questions include whether, under Articles 39, 40 and 43 of the Federal Constitution, a sitting Prime Minister enjoys limited immunity from lawsuits concerning allegations of personal conduct that occurred before his appointment.

According to a supporting affidavit for the application, lawyer Datuk Megat Abdul Munir Megat Abdullah Rafaie, who is authorised to represent the defendant (Anwar), said that if the suit were to proceed, it would affect Anwar's ability to effectively perform his executive functions and undermine the doctrine of separation of powers enshrined in the Constitution.

"The plaintiff's (Yusoff's) claim is politically motivated and, if not examined constitutionally at an early stage, could erode public confidence, diminish the dignity of the constitutional office, and disrupt the executive's ability to perform its constitutional duties," Megat Abdul Munir said in the affidavit.

Megat Abdul Munir further stated that if the court intends to refer these constitutional questions to the Federal Court as a special case, it would be appropriate for the suit's proceedings to be stayed pending the Federal Court's determination of these questions.

Yusoff filed the suit on July 14, 2021, and Anwar, in his statement of defence, contended that Yusoff had lied under oath to the authorities regarding the alleged sexual assault incident.

The PKR president, who filed a counterclaim on Sept 28, 2021, alleged that Yusoff had fabricated the story about the sexual assault to tarnish his political career and prevent him from becoming prime minister.

The High Court last year set June 16 to 19 and June 23 to 25, 2025, for the hearing of the lawsuit.- Bernama

 

 

 

Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel for breaking news alerts and key updates!
court , Anwar Ibrahim , legal questions , decision

Next In Nation

Man feared drowned after being hit by car and falling into KL river
Over RM4mil in 1MDB-linked funds in Swiss bank account recovered by MACC
Religious Minister urges action against misuse of children's images on social media
Actor-singer to be charged with sexual assault next week, Selangor cops say
Dr Wee questions probe against MCA youth leader over mobile data criticism
We welcome constructive criticism, says IGP after Yusoff Rawther acquittal
Vietnam and Malaysia see opportunities to broaden cooperation across key sectors, says expert
Rawang Selatan toll plaza adds lanes to ease rush hour bottlenecks
PM Anwar orders immediate full report on fire at SM Sains Alam Shah
No Malaysians in Iran affected by Israeli attacks, says Wisma Putra

Others Also Read


OSZAR »